1
Washington, DC city
681,294 residents · 61.1 sq mi ·
681 places in category
· 29 ranked
9.94
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 10.00 · 11.14 / sq mi · 7.87 bldg / 100 units · composite 97.6
2
Portland, OR city
641,165 residents · 133.5 sq mi ·
603 places in category
· 29 ranked
9.35
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 9.40 · 4.52 / sq mi · 2.28 bldg / 100 units · composite 88.1
3
Kansas City, MO city
510,612 residents · 314.5 sq mi ·
348 places in category
· 29 ranked
6.78
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 6.82 · 1.11 / sq mi · 1.43 bldg / 100 units · composite 71.4
4
Baltimore, MD city
573,243 residents · 80.9 sq mi ·
313 places in category
· 29 ranked
5.44
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 5.46 · 3.87 / sq mi · 27.55 bldg / 100 units · composite 91.7
5
Boston, MA city
666,442 residents · 48.3 sq mi ·
332 places in category
· 29 ranked
4.97
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 4.98 · 6.87 / sq mi · 3.40 bldg / 100 units · composite 89.3
6
Atlanta, GA city
505,268 residents · 135.3 sq mi ·
236 places in category
· 29 ranked
4.65
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 4.67 · 1.74 / sq mi · 8.42 bldg / 100 units · composite 82.1
7
Denver, CO city
718,877 residents · 153.1 sq mi ·
328 places in category
· 29 ranked
4.55
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 4.56 · 2.14 / sq mi · 1.21 bldg / 100 units · composite 65.5
8
Detroit, MI city
638,530 residents · 138.7 sq mi ·
287 places in category
· 29 ranked
4.48
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 4.49 · 2.07 / sq mi · 1.62 bldg / 100 units · composite 71.4
9
Milwaukee, WI city
566,973 residents · 96.2 sq mi ·
214 places in category
· 29 ranked
3.77
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 3.77 · 2.23 / sq mi · 1.74 bldg / 100 units · composite 75
10
Seattle, WA city
754,195 residents · 84.0 sq mi ·
228 places in category
· 29 ranked
3.02
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 3.02 · 2.71 / sq mi · 0.82 bldg / 100 units · composite 60.7
11
Memphis, TN city
618,980 residents · 289.8 sq mi ·
186 places in category
· 29 ranked
3.00
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 3.00 · 0.64 / sq mi · 5.88 bldg / 100 units · composite 65.5
12
885,860 residents · 361.0 sq mi ·
260 places in category
· 29 ranked
2.93
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 2.94 · 0.72 / sq mi · 3.07 bldg / 100 units · composite 64.3
13
690,130 residents · 475.6 sq mi ·
187 places in category
· 29 ranked
2.71
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 2.71 · 0.39 / sq mi · 1.61 bldg / 100 units · composite 52.4
14
Tucson, AZ city
547,073 residents · 242.9 sq mi ·
147 places in category
· 29 ranked
2.69
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 2.69 · 0.61 / sq mi · 1.39 bldg / 100 units · composite 47.6
15
San Francisco, CA city
830,235 residents · 46.7 sq mi ·
211 places in category
· 29 ranked
2.54
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 2.54 · 4.52 / sq mi · 0.54 bldg / 100 units · composite 54.8
16
Albuquerque, NM city
562,218 residents · 187.3 sq mi ·
140 places in category
· 29 ranked
2.49
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 2.49 · 0.75 / sq mi · 1.37 bldg / 100 units · composite 48.8
17
Austin, TX city
979,539 residents · 325.0 sq mi ·
215 places in category
· 29 ranked
2.20
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 2.19 · 0.66 / sq mi · 0.95 bldg / 100 units · composite 41.7
18
Oklahoma City, OK city
697,125 residents · 607.0 sq mi ·
151 places in category
· 29 ranked
2.17
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 2.17 · 0.25 / sq mi · 1.71 bldg / 100 units · composite 42.9
19
Columbus, OH city
914,802 residents · 221.9 sq mi ·
190 places in category
· 29 ranked
2.08
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 2.08 · 0.86 / sq mi · 1.41 bldg / 100 units · composite 50
20
Sacramento, CA city
528,706 residents · 98.7 sq mi ·
81 places in category
· 29 ranked
1.55
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 1.53 · 0.82 / sq mi · 0.13 bldg / 100 units · composite 32.1
21
631,818 residents · 262.8 sq mi ·
79 places in category
· 29 ranked
1.26
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 1.25 · 0.30 / sq mi · 0.07 bldg / 100 units · composite 21.4
22
Jacksonville, FL city
977,670 residents · 747.3 sq mi ·
108 places in category
· 29 ranked
1.11
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 1.10 · 0.14 / sq mi · 1.49 bldg / 100 units · composite 28.6
23
Fort Worth, TX city
963,194 residents · 352.0 sq mi ·
105 places in category
· 29 ranked
1.10
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 1.09 · 0.30 / sq mi · 0.56 bldg / 100 units · composite 25
24
Charlotte, NC city
903,844 residents · 312.1 sq mi ·
86 places in category
· 29 ranked
0.96
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.95 · 0.28 / sq mi · 0.98 bldg / 100 units · composite 27.4
25
El Paso, TX city
680,130 residents · 258.8 sq mi ·
59 places in category
· 29 ranked
0.88
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.87 · 0.23 / sq mi · 0.78 bldg / 100 units · composite 16.7
26
Mesa, AZ city
511,764 residents · 142.0 sq mi ·
35 places in category
· 29 ranked
0.71
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.68 · 0.25 / sq mi · 0.28 bldg / 100 units · composite 14.3
27
Fresno, CA city
545,970 residents · 115.9 sq mi ·
31 places in category
· 29 ranked
0.59
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.57 · 0.27 / sq mi · 0.02 bldg / 100 units · composite 9.5
28
Las Vegas, NV city
660,400 residents · 141.9 sq mi ·
34 places in category
· 29 ranked
0.53
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.51 · 0.24 / sq mi · 0.16 bldg / 100 units · composite 9.5
29
San Jose, CA city
990,138 residents · 177.9 sq mi ·
35 places in category
· 29 ranked
0.37
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.35 · 0.20 / sq mi · 0.14 bldg / 100 units · composite 4.8