Styles › Tudor Revival › 250,000-499,999 residents

Tudor Revival 250,000-499,999 residents

Listings whose style is Tudor Revival or any style under it, from the nomination form, NRIS, the Atlas, Wikidata or a model reading of the text. Style under Late 19th and 20th Century Revivals. Typical range 1890–1940. Also called Jacobethan, Elizabethan Revival, English Revival, Tudor. Cities of 250,000-499,999 residents, ordered by the adjusted rate of listings per 10,000 residents, with the raw rate beside it. Open in the explorer to rank by another measure, or open it live in Explore to narrow it further.

Coverage. Style comes from the National Register index, Wikidata and, where the nomination text has been read, from the text itself. Nominations have been read for 50 states and the District of Columbia so far, so 110 of the 110 cities ranked here are in a state already read. This will shift as the rest are read.

1
St. Louis, MO
288,512 residents · 61.7 sq mi · 21 places in category · 18 ranked
0.63
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.73 · 0.34 / sq mi · composite 100
2
Cleveland, OH
366,097 residents · 77.7 sq mi · 21 places in category · 18 ranked
0.52
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.57 · 0.27 / sq mi · composite 94.1
3
Fort Wayne, IN
268,589 residents · 111.8 sq mi · 14 places in category · 18 ranked
0.46
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.52 · 0.13 / sq mi · composite 73.5
4
Urban Honolulu, HI
345,482 residents · 60.6 sq mi · 14 places in category · 18 ranked
0.37
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.41 · 0.23 / sq mi · composite 82.4
5
Cincinnati, OH
311,224 residents · 77.9 sq mi · 13 places in category · 18 ranked
0.37
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.42 · 0.17 / sq mi · composite 76.5
6
Pittsburgh, PA
304,759 residents · 55.4 sq mi · 12 places in category · 18 ranked
0.35
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.39 · 0.22 / sq mi · composite 73.6
7
Toledo, OH
267,463 residents · 80.5 sq mi · 10 places in category · 18 ranked
0.33
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.37 · 0.12 / sq mi · composite 58.8
8
Madison, WI
278,001 residents · 84.2 sq mi · 10 places in category · 18 ranked
0.32
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.36 · 0.12 / sq mi · composite 53
9
Buffalo, NY
276,854 residents · 40.4 sq mi · 9 places in category · 18 ranked
0.29
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.33 · 0.22 / sq mi · composite 67.7
10
Tulsa, OK
413,794 residents · 197.7 sq mi · 13 places in category · 18 ranked
0.29
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.31 · 0.07 / sq mi · composite 38.3
11
Omaha, NE
488,837 residents · 143.0 sq mi · 14 places in category · 18 ranked
0.27
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.29 · 0.10 / sq mi · composite 41.2
12
Wichita, KS
397,945 residents · 165.1 sq mi · 8 places in category · 18 ranked
0.19
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.20 · 0.05 / sq mi · composite 26.5
13
Minneapolis, MN
427,246 residents · 54.0 sq mi · 8 places in category · 18 ranked
0.18
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.19 · 0.15 / sq mi · composite 44.1
14
St. Petersburg, FL
262,732 residents · 61.8 sq mi · 5 places in category · 18 ranked
0.18
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.19 · 0.08 / sq mi · composite 32.3
15
Colorado Springs, CO
487,887 residents · 202.2 sq mi · 9 places in category · 18 ranked
0.18
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.18 · 0.04 / sq mi · composite 11.8
16
Reno, NV
273,212 residents · 109.3 sq mi · 5 places in category · 18 ranked
0.17
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.18 · 0.05 / sq mi · composite 11.8
17
Lincoln, NE
294,856 residents · 102.5 sq mi · 5 places in category · 18 ranked
0.16
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.17 · 0.05 / sq mi · composite 14.7
18
Orlando, FL
319,758 residents · 129.6 sq mi · 5 places in category · 18 ranked
0.15
per 10,000 residents (adjusted)
raw 0.16 · 0.04 / sq mi · composite 0